[Tranc{E]nd} ([info]seattlesque) wrote,
@ 2003-05-06 20:55:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: amused
Current music:Aimee Mann - Frankenstein (4:27)

alcohol, porn, and $50
You know those things you read in the city paper? The little ads that say "smoke marijuana, make money" or "are you between the ages of 21 and 35, and do you drink socially? we'll pay you to drink!"

I responded to one of those. It was about alcohol consumption, claiming they'd pay you $15 an hour to drink. I called and left a message with my telephone number, and much to my surprise they called back.

When they called, they asked various questions about my physical health and sexual history. As it turns out, they wanted me to participate in a study where they would give me some amount of alcohol (in order to achieve a particular blood alcohol content) and then show me erotic videos and test my response to the situations. For all of this, I would be paid $15 an hour.

Sounds too good to be true? Well, sort of. Here were the catches:

Catch #1: You have to wear an erect-o-meter (technical name: plethysmograph) which is essentially a rubber band connected to a bunch of wires that measure the circumference of your member. As if in some kind of grade school joke, we had to cycle through 4 different plethysmographs. The reason was--and I quote the researcher--"I keep getting a negative reading". Ha. Ha. Anyway, once the faulty connection was found and replaced, and I crossed over that ZERO circumference problem, we could proceed.

Catch #2: I was in the control group, which meant that I ended up not getting any alcohol. Instead I had to drink 3 pint glasses of orange juice (no vodka included) in 9 minutes, and repeatedly take breathalyzer tests despite the fact that they were guaranteed to show 0.00. This tedious procedure was to ensure that the only variable in the study was the alcohol content, not how much time you spent blowing into a tube. I like orange juice as much as the next guy, but...

Catch #3: The porn was terrible and cliche, including the bad-quality music with Casio-keyboard-preset drum beats. I was given the instruction to try and become as aroused as possible (although apparently other subjects were told to try and repress arousal as much as possible)...and it wasn't too easy, given what I had to work with. Being in a lab didn't help.

The funniest bit, actually, was the calibration video. While wearing the erect-o-meter, they had me watch a nature video narrated by a guy who looked like Ernest Borgnine...it was all about the life cycle of the arctic tern. I was cracked up by the idea of being aroused by that video. So I kept laughing hysterically...thinking about people who would get stimulated by watching these birds and who would have no response to the human sex. I can only hope that the erect-o-meter took notice of my laughs and recorded them as stimulation...

All in all, a very interesting way to spend my morning, and I'm $50 richer. Afterwards, I walked around the UW campus (which I had never really done) and ran into [info]jclawshe, and we discussed Oscar Wilde & the ethical dilemmas in "A Picture of Dorian Gray" at his office hours.

UPDATE: someone's life may hang in the balance of this blog entry!




(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]syd_x
2003-05-06 09:07 pm UTC (link)
two words for you........freakin freak!

ethical dilemas in a picture of dorian grey....hmmmmm is that possible?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jclawshe
2003-05-07 02:40 pm UTC (link)
to be fair to s. who seems to be deferring to the part of the conversation in which I actually might have known what I was talking about, we actually spent most of the time talking about the relationship between thought and reality. Mostly the Dorian Gray bit was about me explaining how Wilde tried to claim it was a book about morals without a moral. But that was after the erect-o-meter which was priceless. Too bad knowing what the test was for means I can't take it now.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]syd_x
2003-05-07 02:46 pm UTC (link)
ahhh i see

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Freak?
[info]rowrupa
2003-05-06 09:19 pm UTC (link)
Who you callin' a freak?

Just another freak in the Freak Kingdom.

There he goes -- one of God's own prototypes -- a high powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live and too rare to die.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Freak?
[info]syd_x
2003-05-06 09:38 pm UTC (link)
heh, if he's a prototype then what the hell am i......


they must have broken the mold and burned the pieces afterward with me.....

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]cagekitten
2003-05-06 10:09 pm UTC (link)
Thank you! This is the first journal entry EVER of anyone that has ever made me laugh out loud.

You seriously should submit this to a paper or magazine or something.

(Reply to this)


[info]leeloolala
2003-05-06 11:32 pm UTC (link)
mr. s, you made my day.

(Reply to this)


[info]shya
2003-05-07 01:33 pm UTC (link)
i did that too! a friend of mine was working on that project for a while. it is a study to measure the effects of alcohol on sexual conduct (responsibility, etc.). don't you find it odd that they measure the penis's erection without first calibrating it? it seems like they'd need to take a fully erect measurement as well as a baseline, in order to translate the stimulation into some kind of ratio of "not at all to very stimulated". but whatever. the bird video was indeed entertaining.

the whole thing seemed like a good idea to me too, except that they fed me with way too much alcohol, and i had to stick around for 3 hours afterward, eating microwave borritoes and watching the simpsons, until my blood alcohol level reached below "drunk". i left with raging headache.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

peter pays the bills
[info]seattlesque
2003-05-07 01:45 pm UTC (link)
Due to my "negative circumference" debacle, they ran out of precalibrated erect-o-meters so they had to calibrate another one. It seems they use some sort of balloon thingy, which they run through an inflation cycle and measure the output of the sensor. Then they have a graph correlating the output with a known circumference.

I guess they figure there's not enough hysteresis to cause a problem...and they normalize the curve and assume some kind of excitement linearity. Who knows.

I was thinking it would be good to get some of those devices and have a party where everyone is wearing one, and you see little graphs on the wall but you don't know whose graph it is. I'm trying to imagine people going around and trying to create spikes (so to speak) in order to figure out which graph belongs to whom...

Add it to the list of things I'd do if I had a disposable income (heck, any income I had would be disposable, if I had one).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: peter pays the bills
[info]lele
2003-05-07 07:26 pm UTC (link)
i might be interested in attending such a party. heck i'll bet [info]yrekabakery would love to work on the graphs :)
would there be a video playing in the background of arctic terns? i'm so there.

thanks for making me laugh today.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(10 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…